Search This Blog

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Clovis watering fines exceed $227,000 in August

Fresno Bee

Second-time offenders lead to surge in penalties
Clovis residents must cut water use 36 percent to avoid fines
Fresno continues to cite residents watering on incorrect days

Fines for Clovis residents not meeting state water-consumption rules shot up in August to $227,882, city officials said.
In the three months the state mandates have been in effect, the city has fined water customers nearly $500,000. The city fines customers for not meeting the state-mandated 36 percent cut.
Fines in Clovis for June and July totaled $269,257. In August, the first month that $50 fines were levied against second-time offenders, fines went up more than 50 percent from July.
In July, the city cut water use 36.3 percent, slightly better than the percentage mandated by the state. In August, the city reduced water consumption by 32.5 percent.
City officials said residents used less water in August 2013 than in July 2013, which made it more difficult to reach the state’s mandate. The mandated cut is based on a comparison of consumption in 2013 and this year.
The city issued more than $162,812 in penalties to residents. Commercial, industrial and other users were fined $65,070. Customers in Clovis are billed every other month.
The city fines are included in customers’ bills. First-time fines for residential users are $25. There were 1,920 such fines issued in August. Second-time fines for residential users are $50, which is also the maximum fine. In August, 2,621 customers were fined $50.
There is an additional fine of $12.50 that is levied based on a complicated, sliding-scale formula applied to residents who don’t meet the 36 percent cut but use less than the average household. There were 681 fines in August for customers in that category.
The amount of water used as the year continues will decrease as landscape irrigation phases out in the fall and winter, which means there will be fewer ways to meet the 36 percent cut for that time of year, city officials say.
That means that as the year goes on, the number of fines could increase, said Lisa Koehn, assistant public utilities director in Clovis.
“I think it’s going to get worse,” she said. “Some people are just ignoring it, and those are the ones we’d probably like to focus on.”
She said the number of customer water-use audits has increased exponentially and the city continues to have a backlog.
“There are a lot more than we ever had before,” she said.
In Fresno, 799 fines – totaling $35,955 – were issued in August. Fresno’s fine is $45 for residents who water on incorrect days or on no-watering days: Monday, Thursday and Friday.
Fresno’s fines went down because employee vacations and the shifting of an enforcement team member to the rebate program led to an enforcement reduction, said Mark Standriff, a city spokesman.
The city issued 1,008 citations in July, 1,761 in June and 1,204 in May, documents show.
Standriff said the city likely will reach a record in fines this year, exceeding the 2012 markof 7,562. So far this year, Fresno has issued 5,811 fines.
In addition, Fresno city employees already have reached out to 17,211 water customers who were not fined for watering incorrectly, which far exceeds the 12,909 customers who were counseled and not fined last year.

Posted by at No comments:

Monday, September 14, 2015

Too early to hang our hopes on El Niño


Salinas Californian

Scott Borgioli, a meteorologist and owner of Visalia-based WeatherAg.com, was in Salinas Thursday using a weather station to determine how much water is necessary for crops with current weather conditions. Borgioli and his company have put out a report looking at whether a wet winter will come to drought-ridden California can be reliably predicted now. (Juan Villa, The Salinas Californian)


After years of drought conditions that have developed into the worst California has seen since weather conditions were recorded here, people across the state have been anxious for some good news about the weather.

And in recent weeks they’ve gotten it, with reports about an unusually strong El Niño event — a warming of the waters in the equatorial Pacific Ocean that affects weather pattern — that’s raising the odds of a wet winter and spring in the state.

Some have gone as far to use “monster,” “Godzilla” and even “Bruce Lee” to describe this El Niño’s strength how much wet weather it might usher into the a state desperately in need of rain and snowpack.

In fact, the media has some people believing that this could be the winter that cancels the ill effects to California’s mega drought.

At least that’s what Scott Borgioli has been hearing among some of the farmers and ranchers who are his clients in the Central Valley, the Central Coast and other parts of the state.

“Almost every person I bump into is saying, hearing, ‘Record-breaking El Niño.’ That’s the correlation that people are assuming — that El Niño equals rain,” said Borgioli, a meteorologist and owner of WeatherAg, a Visalia-based forecasting service for the agricultural industry.

The problem, he said, is those expectations just aren’t realistic. At least not yet.

Borgioli said numerous computerized weather models show that the El Niño forming in the Pacific likely will be strong, maybe even very strong, which could affect weather here from about mid December through spring.

In fact, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Climate.gov blog puts the odds at 95 percent that the current El Niño will continue through this year’s rain season and describes it as “pretty strong,” while some experts put it on track to be stronger than the three strongest El Niño events recorded since the 1950s.

Prior to that, meteorologists didn’t have the equipment and ocean temperature data to track or even recognize the existence of El Niño.

While Borgioli agrees about the projected strength of the El Niño, he said, “For the purposes of simplicity, there is a misconception that a strong El Niño will 100 percent bring significant rainfall across California. The truth is a significant El Niño, in and of itself, will not cause strong rainfall across California.

“People may be missing that part of the story,” particularly since the media is focusing so hard on the strength of the El Niño and its potential effects, without focusing enough on the long-term drought situation and the fact that scientists have only a few decades of detailed information on El Niños.

And of the five known strong or very strong situations El Niño years recorded, heavy rains came only 75 percent of the time, Borgioli noted.

“Before we draw a conclusion of what we can expect this weather year — this rainy season — there is a lot of science that needs to come into play.”

So for about the past month and a half, Borgioli, an expert in extended weather patterns — or “osculations” — that include El Niño, has been studying the current one developing in the ocean between South America and the Indian Ocean and looking at the data from past events.

Earlier this week, he distributed a report of his findings and conclusions to news organizations, and he plans to distribute copies to his clients and post it online in order to give what he considers a more accurate appraisal of the weather and point out the limitations of making weather predictions so far ahead of winter.

“There’s so much misconception out there about El Niño that is obtained from various weather sources. I wanted to set the facts straight” as well as to explain the variables that could interfere with a wet winter. “Let’s put on the brakes. Let’s understand the components.”

And he’s not alone.

Bill Patzert, a climatologist and oceanographer for NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, hasn’t read WeatherAg’s report, but said, “I understand exactly what he’s saying.

“It’s similar to what I have said. There is no guaranteeing double the snowpack and the rainfall in California [this winter].”

Certainly, this current El Niño started out strong in January, and it’s just as strong now, and there is the possibility that it could be the the strongest of the three strongest El Niños ever recorded — in the 1972-73, 1982-83 and 1997-98 rain seasons — all of which ushered in heavy precipitation, Patzert said.

Why we’re in a drought

Part of WeatherAg’s analysis involves explaining in the 15-page report why California is in its fourth year of severe drought.

A big part of the reason for the drought is persistent high pressure that has “hugged” the eastern Pacific Ocean, off the California Coast in recent years that deflected storm systems north, away from California and some other western states.

“As long as I’ve seen, I’ve never seen a pattern like this. This current pattern has lasted a little more than 2 years,” said Borgioli.

This persistent pressure system stems form the Pacific Decadal Oscillation — or “PCO” — a phenomenon similar to El Niño in which ocean temperatures change every 10 to 30 years along a “horseshoe” pattern in the Pacific from off California’s coast to Canada’s Coast

“If it continues into this rainfall year, we will see a continuation of the storm tracks not making their way into California as often as we would expect with a strong El Niño.”

On top of that, other weather events likely would have to take place, along with a strong or very strong El Niño, to allow heavy storm activity in the state this winter and spring.

They include:

•A Madden-Julian oscillation, which essentially is an low-pressure system over the area where the western Pacific intersects with the Indian Ocean. This could “spin” additional moisture over the western Pacific and feed West Coast-bound storms, Borgioli said..

•Above-average barometric pressure over western North America and its coast, which could break down the pressure system that has been deflecting storms away western states, and “open the storm door” for California,” he explained.

•The PCO would have to remain in a warm phase, and it currently is doing so, Borgioli added.

And Patzert said, “El Niño is a marathon. It stared in January extremely strong, and it is exceptionally strong for September,” but it could still defy some predictions and weaken in the coming months.

But Warren Blier, a National Weather Service science officers at the San Francisco/Monterey Bay Area Weather Forecast Office, said he puts stock in the “vast majority” or forecasting models showing El Niño will continue to be strong, at least into the beginning of winter.

“I would say it’s likely we are going to have a wetter than normal winter, but it’s not definite. I wouldn’t go so far as saying extremely likely, but I would say likely.”

NOAA also puts the chances for a wet winter as stronger for Southern California than for the central and northern parts of the state. The agency puts the odds for rainier-than-average conditions across much of the central region at above 30 percent.

For his part, Patzert said that despite the Weather Service’s assertions, “I don’t say things we don’t’ know.”

As for Bogioli, he said it likely will not be until October or November before any reliable forecasts could be made for the coming winter, and the anomalous high pressure continues to sit off the coast, “and high pressure is very hard to break down.”

Still, he said, the data available about the current El Niño is reason to be optimistic about the possibility of a wet winter here, “but don’t bet the farm on it.”

And if all the events line up to bring a very wet winter to California, chances are the effects of the droughts could remain for years, Borgioili said.

For thing, current forecasts call for the storms that could approach California being fed by warmer, “tropical” air that would result in warmer storms that drop less snow in California’s mountain, which serves as a natural storage space for much of the state’s water, he said.

So capturing rain in dams, waterways and recharge basins for groundwater will be particularly crucial this winter and spring, Borgioli said.

And after experiencing the driest four successive winters since 1895, one wet winter — even a very wet on — will not be enough offset the water losses and recharge aquifers from the drought, he noted.

“We need three to four years of above-average precipitation to really bail California out of the drought. And I’m talking really above average,” about 140 to 150 percent above normal in the Central Valley alone, Borgioli said.

And even then, a lot of the natural, underground storage capacity for water has been lost, as areas of the state have sunk down because so much water has been pumped out from under them, he said.

“The ground really doesn’t just pop up” when water returns to the aquifers.
Posted by at No comments:

Friday, September 4, 2015

Forget about Water, September is fairs month! Find a fair near you

“Mermaid Melissa” at the Los Angeles County Fair in 2013














9/3/2015 to 9/6/2015
Bishop, CA
9/10/2015 to 9/13/2015
Auburn, CA
9/3/2015 to 9/7/2015
McArthur, CA
9/23/2015 to 10/4/2015
Bakersfield, CA
9/3/2015 to 9/6/2015
Lakeport, CA
9/17/2015 to 9/20/2015
Lodi, CA
9/4/2015 to 9/27/2015
Pomona, CA
9/10/2015 to 9/13/2015
Madera, CA
9/4/2015 to 9/7/2015
Mariposa, CA
9/18/2015 to 9/20/2015
Boonville, CA
9/2/2015 to 9/7/2015
Monterey, CA
9/16/2015 to 9/20/2015
Watsonville, CA
9/24/2015 to 9/27/2015
Red Bluff, CA
9/16/2015 to 9/20/2015
Tulare, CA
9/10/2015 to 9/13/2015
Tulelake, CA
Posted by at No comments:

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

August Update

Dear Member:

 August came and went as August's usually do with nice hot Fresno weather that makes us pine for fall.  The weather forecast for September, at least until mid-month does not sow much relief.  Cooling will come and with it a reduction in the amount water our plants need survive.  If you have a seasonal adjustment on your sprinkler controller, you should be resetting soon to 80% of normal.

Water Usage


We were not quite as thrifty with water usage as we had been.  August usage was 6% behind the target and 4% more than last August.  Year to date, we are still 14% better than last year and only 2% behind the target usage.

Click her for a larger view.

Floyd "Doc" Buchanan



Our neighbor and friend, Doc passed away August 11 at the age of 91. Doc built his house on Sanders Court in the late 1960's or early 70's and raised five children with his wife Molly until she passed away in 2006. Doc served as the President of Belmont Water Corporation at one time and was always interested in how the water system was faring. Doc served as Superintendent of Schools for Clovis Unified School District for 31 years.  The Buchanan Educational Center in Clovis was named after him. He was a good friend and will be missed by all who knew him.

Mainline Water Valves

Those of you with "missing" mainline water valves should be receiving a call from a representative of Costless Plumbing in the next few weeks to schedule the search for your valve.  Please contact a board member if there is an issue with the scheduling or the search.

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)